Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
For e-filed appeals under Section 61 of the IBC, limitation is computed from the date of e-filing, in line with the NCLAT's 24.12.2022 directions issued under the NCLAT Rules, 2016. The Tribunal rejected reliance on Delhi High Court e-filing rules because no material showed they applied to NCLAT. It applied the Supreme Court's view that a statutory day runs for 24 hours from midnight, so filing after office hours does not shift the filing date to the next working day. An appeal e-filed at 9.00 p.m. on the 45th day was therefore within the condonable period, and the 15-day delay was condoned.
For e-filed appeals under Section 61 of the IBC, limitation is computed from the date of e-filing, in line with the NCLAT's 24.12.2022 directions issued under the NCLAT Rules, 2016. The Tribunal rejected reliance on Delhi High Court e-filing rules because no material showed they applied to NCLAT. It applied the Supreme Court's view that a statutory day runs for 24 hours from midnight, so filing after office hours does not shift the filing date to the next working day. An appeal e-filed at 9.00 p.m. on the 45th day was therefore within the condonable period, and the 15-day delay was condoned.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.