Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1221 to 1240 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 54F relief was available where the assessee booked an under-construction flat, paid substantially the entire consideration within the statutory period, and obtained registration later. The Tribunal treated the transaction as falling within the construction limb of Section 54F, so the three-year period applied and delayed execution of the sale deed did not defeat the claim. It further held that, even on a purchase analysis, the critical factor was acquisition of substantial domain over the property through timely substantial payment, not the date of registration alone. On these facts, the deduction was allowed and the denial by the lower authorities was reversed.
Section 54F relief was available where the assessee booked an under-construction flat, paid substantially the entire consideration within the statutory period, and obtained registration later. The Tribunal treated the transaction as falling within the construction limb of Section 54F, so the three-year period applied and delayed execution of the sale deed did not defeat the claim. It further held that, even on a purchase analysis, the critical factor was acquisition of substantial domain over the property through timely substantial payment, not the date of registration alone. On these facts, the deduction was allowed and the denial by the lower authorities was reversed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.