Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Section 54F relief was available where the assessee booked an under-construction flat, paid substantially the entire consideration within the statutory period, and obtained registration later. The Tribunal treated the transaction as falling within the construction limb of Section 54F, so the three-year period applied and delayed execution of the sale deed did not defeat the claim. It further held that, even on a purchase analysis, the critical factor was acquisition of substantial domain over the property through timely substantial payment, not the date of registration alone. On these facts, the deduction was allowed and the denial by the lower authorities was reversed.
Section 54F relief was available where the assessee booked an under-construction flat, paid substantially the entire consideration within the statutory period, and obtained registration later. The Tribunal treated the transaction as falling within the construction limb of Section 54F, so the three-year period applied and delayed execution of the sale deed did not defeat the claim. It further held that, even on a purchase analysis, the critical factor was acquisition of substantial domain over the property through timely substantial payment, not the date of registration alone. On these facts, the deduction was allowed and the denial by the lower authorities was reversed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
