Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Transactions between the assessee and its Indian dependent agent permanent establishments having been accepted at arm's length after transfer pricing proceedings, no further profit attribution to the PE was permissible under the treaty principle applied by the Tribunal, and the related addition was deleted. On the refund interest claim, the Tribunal did not decide the entitlement on merits and instead directed factual verification by the Assessing Officer in accordance with law, with disposal based on that verification.
Transactions between the assessee and its Indian dependent agent permanent establishments having been accepted at arm's length after transfer pricing proceedings, no further profit attribution to the PE was permissible under the treaty principle applied by the Tribunal, and the related addition was deleted. On the refund interest claim, the Tribunal did not decide the entitlement on merits and instead directed factual verification by the Assessing Officer in accordance with law, with disposal based on that verification.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.