Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Transactions between the assessee and its Indian dependent agent permanent establishments having been accepted at arm's length after transfer pricing proceedings, no further profit attribution to the PE was permissible under the treaty principle applied by the Tribunal, and the related addition was deleted. On the refund interest claim, the Tribunal did not decide the entitlement on merits and instead directed factual verification by the Assessing Officer in accordance with law, with disposal based on that verification.
Transactions between the assessee and its Indian dependent agent permanent establishments having been accepted at arm's length after transfer pricing proceedings, no further profit attribution to the PE was permissible under the treaty principle applied by the Tribunal, and the related addition was deleted. On the refund interest claim, the Tribunal did not decide the entitlement on merits and instead directed factual verification by the Assessing Officer in accordance with law, with disposal based on that verification.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.