Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Long-term capital loss from share sales could not be adjusted against long-term capital gains exempt under Article 13(4) of the India-Mauritius DTAA, because such exempt gains did not enter the Indian computation of total income. Applying section 90(2), the Tribunal held that the taxpayer could rely on the treaty for exempt gains and on the Act for more beneficial treatment in relation to carry forward of loss. It also treated gains and losses from separate share transactions as distinct sources under the same head. The restriction on carry forward after set-off against treaty-exempt gains was unsustainable, and the loss was directed to be carried forward without such adjustment.
Long-term capital loss from share sales could not be adjusted against long-term capital gains exempt under Article 13(4) of the India-Mauritius DTAA, because such exempt gains did not enter the Indian computation of total income. Applying section 90(2), the Tribunal held that the taxpayer could rely on the treaty for exempt gains and on the Act for more beneficial treatment in relation to carry forward of loss. It also treated gains and losses from separate share transactions as distinct sources under the same head. The restriction on carry forward after set-off against treaty-exempt gains was unsustainable, and the loss was directed to be carried forward without such adjustment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
