Restriction of Input Tax Credit under Rule 86A applies only to fraudulently or ineligible availed credit; mere wrongful recipient availment is insuffi...
ITAT deleted the addition in the firm's hands for partners' capital contribution under section 68, holding that once the firm furnished the source of capital and the partners confirmed the contribution, its onus stood discharged; any further inquiry into creditworthiness had to be made against the partners, not the firm. On unsecured loans from two creditors, the Tribunal found the assessee's version of banking-channel receipts and later repayment with interest required verification of bank entries and repayment evidence. That issue was remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication, with no addition indicated if repayment was established. The appeal was thus allowed for statistical purposes.
ITAT deleted the addition in the firm's hands for partners' capital contribution under section 68, holding that once the firm furnished the source of capital and the partners confirmed the contribution, its onus stood discharged; any further inquiry into creditworthiness had to be made against the partners, not the firm. On unsecured loans from two creditors, the Tribunal found the assessee's version of banking-channel receipts and later repayment with interest required verification of bank entries and repayment evidence. That issue was remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication, with no addition indicated if repayment was established. The appeal was thus allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.