Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Leave encashment exemption for a non-Government employee under section 10(10AA) was held to be computable on the basis of the revised CBDT ceiling applicable for AY 2020-21. Following its earlier decision and co-ordinate Bench rulings, the ITAT accepted that the enhanced limit applied, so the restriction made by the lower authorities to the earlier ceiling could not stand. The matter was remanded only for recomputation of the admissible exemption on the revised ceiling, with consequential deletion of the addition to that extent.
Leave encashment exemption for a non-Government employee under section 10(10AA) was held to be computable on the basis of the revised CBDT ceiling applicable for AY 2020-21. Following its earlier decision and co-ordinate Bench rulings, the ITAT accepted that the enhanced limit applied, so the restriction made by the lower authorities to the earlier ceiling could not stand. The matter was remanded only for recomputation of the admissible exemption on the revised ceiling, with consequential deletion of the addition to that extent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
