Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
Leave encashment exemption for a non-Government employee under section 10(10AA) was held to be computable on the basis of the revised CBDT ceiling applicable for AY 2020-21. Following its earlier decision and co-ordinate Bench rulings, the ITAT accepted that the enhanced limit applied, so the restriction made by the lower authorities to the earlier ceiling could not stand. The matter was remanded only for recomputation of the admissible exemption on the revised ceiling, with consequential deletion of the addition to that extent.
Leave encashment exemption for a non-Government employee under section 10(10AA) was held to be computable on the basis of the revised CBDT ceiling applicable for AY 2020-21. Following its earlier decision and co-ordinate Bench rulings, the ITAT accepted that the enhanced limit applied, so the restriction made by the lower authorities to the earlier ceiling could not stand. The matter was remanded only for recomputation of the admissible exemption on the revised ceiling, with consequential deletion of the addition to that extent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.