Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Leave encashment exemption for a non-Government employee under section 10(10AA) was held to be computable on the basis of the revised CBDT ceiling applicable for AY 2020-21. Following its earlier decision and co-ordinate Bench rulings, the ITAT accepted that the enhanced limit applied, so the restriction made by the lower authorities to the earlier ceiling could not stand. The matter was remanded only for recomputation of the admissible exemption on the revised ceiling, with consequential deletion of the addition to that extent.
Leave encashment exemption for a non-Government employee under section 10(10AA) was held to be computable on the basis of the revised CBDT ceiling applicable for AY 2020-21. Following its earlier decision and co-ordinate Bench rulings, the ITAT accepted that the enhanced limit applied, so the restriction made by the lower authorities to the earlier ceiling could not stand. The matter was remanded only for recomputation of the admissible exemption on the revised ceiling, with consequential deletion of the addition to that extent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.