Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Imported telecom equipment was classified by applying the functional test to its actual working. The Airspan Air Velocity 2700 was found to receive signals from the tower, synchronize them and route them through lines within the enclosed area to support a 5G network efficiently. On that functional character, the classification declared by the importer under Customs Tariff Heading 8517 6260 was upheld, and the alternative classification as other transmission or routing apparatus was not accepted.
Imported telecom equipment was classified by applying the functional test to its actual working. The Airspan Air Velocity 2700 was found to receive signals from the tower, synchronize them and route them through lines within the enclosed area to support a 5G network efficiently. On that functional character, the classification declared by the importer under Customs Tariff Heading 8517 6260 was upheld, and the alternative classification as other transmission or routing apparatus was not accepted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.