Specialized Investment Fund distribution now requires dedicated certification, while transitional recognition preserves existing qualified distributor...
Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Service of an adjudication order on an authorised representative was treated as valid communication under the governing service provision, and the appeal period was counted from that date. Because the appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals) was filed after the statutory limit and beyond the condonable extension, the majority held it to be time-barred and not maintainable. The contrary view that the appeal should be examined on merits was rejected, and the dismissal for limitation was upheld.
Service of an adjudication order on an authorised representative was treated as valid communication under the governing service provision, and the appeal period was counted from that date. Because the appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals) was filed after the statutory limit and beyond the condonable extension, the majority held it to be time-barred and not maintainable. The contrary view that the appeal should be examined on merits was rejected, and the dismissal for limitation was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
