Fraudulent trading requires cogent evidence of intent to defraud; ordinary-course payments protected, except post-insolvency withdrawals must be resto...
Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Service of an adjudication order on an authorised representative was treated as valid communication under the governing service provision, and the appeal period was counted from that date. Because the appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals) was filed after the statutory limit and beyond the condonable extension, the majority held it to be time-barred and not maintainable. The contrary view that the appeal should be examined on merits was rejected, and the dismissal for limitation was upheld.
Service of an adjudication order on an authorised representative was treated as valid communication under the governing service provision, and the appeal period was counted from that date. Because the appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals) was filed after the statutory limit and beyond the condonable extension, the majority held it to be time-barred and not maintainable. The contrary view that the appeal should be examined on merits was rejected, and the dismissal for limitation was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
