Person chargeable with duty must be the importer at importation; subsequent purchasers cannot be held liable where beneficial owner rules did not appl...
Service of an adjudication order on an authorised representative was treated as valid communication under the governing service provision, and the appeal period was counted from that date. Because the appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals) was filed after the statutory limit and beyond the condonable extension, the majority held it to be time-barred and not maintainable. The contrary view that the appeal should be examined on merits was rejected, and the dismissal for limitation was upheld.
Service of an adjudication order on an authorised representative was treated as valid communication under the governing service provision, and the appeal period was counted from that date. Because the appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals) was filed after the statutory limit and beyond the condonable extension, the majority held it to be time-barred and not maintainable. The contrary view that the appeal should be examined on merits was rejected, and the dismissal for limitation was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
