Service of an adjudication order on an authorised representative was treated as valid communication under the governing service provision, and the appeal period was counted from that date. Because the appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals) was filed after the statutory limit and beyond the condonable extension, the majority held it to be time-barred and not maintainable. The contrary view that the appeal should be examined on merits was rejected, and the dismissal for limitation was upheld.
Service of an adjudication order on an authorised representative was treated as valid communication under the governing service provision, and the appeal period was counted from that date. Because the appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals) was filed after the statutory limit and beyond the condonable extension, the majority held it to be time-barred and not maintainable. The contrary view that the appeal should be examined on merits was rejected, and the dismissal for limitation was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
