Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Where the authorities were already aware of the relevant period when issuing the show cause notice, failure to quantify interest in that notice was held to bar its later inclusion in the adjudication order, because the amount of tax, interest and penalty demanded cannot exceed what is specified in the notice. The provision permitting interest to be imposed even if not stated in the order was found inapplicable, as it addresses omission in the adjudication order and not omission in the show cause notice itself. On that basis, the interest demand and the consequential notice and order were quashed, with liberty to issue a fresh notice in accordance with law.
Where the authorities were already aware of the relevant period when issuing the show cause notice, failure to quantify interest in that notice was held to bar its later inclusion in the adjudication order, because the amount of tax, interest and penalty demanded cannot exceed what is specified in the notice. The provision permitting interest to be imposed even if not stated in the order was found inapplicable, as it addresses omission in the adjudication order and not omission in the show cause notice itself. On that basis, the interest demand and the consequential notice and order were quashed, with liberty to issue a fresh notice in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.