Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
HC held that confiscatory proceedings under the GST enactment cannot be invoked where the sole basis is excess stock found during survey. Because the impugned orders fastened tax liability and imposed penalty on that foundation alone, they were beyond the jurisdiction conferred by law and contrary to the settled legal position. The Court therefore set aside the orders and allowed the writ petition.
HC held that confiscatory proceedings under the GST enactment cannot be invoked where the sole basis is excess stock found during survey. Because the impugned orders fastened tax liability and imposed penalty on that foundation alone, they were beyond the jurisdiction conferred by law and contrary to the settled legal position. The Court therefore set aside the orders and allowed the writ petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
