Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
HC held that confiscatory proceedings under the GST enactment cannot be invoked where the sole basis is excess stock found during survey. Because the impugned orders fastened tax liability and imposed penalty on that foundation alone, they were beyond the jurisdiction conferred by law and contrary to the settled legal position. The Court therefore set aside the orders and allowed the writ petition.
HC held that confiscatory proceedings under the GST enactment cannot be invoked where the sole basis is excess stock found during survey. Because the impugned orders fastened tax liability and imposed penalty on that foundation alone, they were beyond the jurisdiction conferred by law and contrary to the settled legal position. The Court therefore set aside the orders and allowed the writ petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
