Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 96136 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 270AA gives finality where an assessee accepts the assessment without appeal and secures immunity from penalty and prosecution; a later section 154 rectification cannot be used to substantially rewrite the assessment or change its tax consequence, so the rectification order was without jurisdiction. An ad hoc disallowance of expenditure already recorded in the books and reflected in the accounts is not unexplained expenditure under section 69C; it is only an estimated disallowance for want of verification, so section 115BBE could not be applied in rectification proceedings. The Tribunal quashed both the rectification order and the appellate order affirming it.
Section 270AA gives finality where an assessee accepts the assessment without appeal and secures immunity from penalty and prosecution; a later section 154 rectification cannot be used to substantially rewrite the assessment or change its tax consequence, so the rectification order was without jurisdiction. An ad hoc disallowance of expenditure already recorded in the books and reflected in the accounts is not unexplained expenditure under section 69C; it is only an estimated disallowance for want of verification, so section 115BBE could not be applied in rectification proceedings. The Tribunal quashed both the rectification order and the appellate order affirming it.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.