Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Section 270AA gives finality where an assessee accepts the assessment without appeal and secures immunity from penalty and prosecution; a later section 154 rectification cannot be used to substantially rewrite the assessment or change its tax consequence, so the rectification order was without jurisdiction. An ad hoc disallowance of expenditure already recorded in the books and reflected in the accounts is not unexplained expenditure under section 69C; it is only an estimated disallowance for want of verification, so section 115BBE could not be applied in rectification proceedings. The Tribunal quashed both the rectification order and the appellate order affirming it.
Section 270AA gives finality where an assessee accepts the assessment without appeal and secures immunity from penalty and prosecution; a later section 154 rectification cannot be used to substantially rewrite the assessment or change its tax consequence, so the rectification order was without jurisdiction. An ad hoc disallowance of expenditure already recorded in the books and reflected in the accounts is not unexplained expenditure under section 69C; it is only an estimated disallowance for want of verification, so section 115BBE could not be applied in rectification proceedings. The Tribunal quashed both the rectification order and the appellate order affirming it.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.