Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Section 270AA gives finality where an assessee accepts the assessment without appeal and secures immunity from penalty and prosecution; a later section 154 rectification cannot be used to substantially rewrite the assessment or change its tax consequence, so the rectification order was without jurisdiction. An ad hoc disallowance of expenditure already recorded in the books and reflected in the accounts is not unexplained expenditure under section 69C; it is only an estimated disallowance for want of verification, so section 115BBE could not be applied in rectification proceedings. The Tribunal quashed both the rectification order and the appellate order affirming it.
Section 270AA gives finality where an assessee accepts the assessment without appeal and secures immunity from penalty and prosecution; a later section 154 rectification cannot be used to substantially rewrite the assessment or change its tax consequence, so the rectification order was without jurisdiction. An ad hoc disallowance of expenditure already recorded in the books and reflected in the accounts is not unexplained expenditure under section 69C; it is only an estimated disallowance for want of verification, so section 115BBE could not be applied in rectification proceedings. The Tribunal quashed both the rectification order and the appellate order affirming it.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.