Customs seizure safeguards prevent detention-based limitation avoidance and invalidate provisional release conditions for imported vehicles under an i...
Preliminary reassessment proceedings generally require statutory remedies unless jurisdiction is wholly absent or mandatory conditions are patently br...
Agricultural land classification requires cumulative factual indicators, while industrial-purpose land and absent agricultural use defeat reinvestment...
Section 12AB(4) could not be used to cancel charitable...
Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenuine activity.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Section 12AB(4) could not be used to cancel charitable registration retrospectively for years before its insertion on 1 April 2022, so cancellation from AY 2018-19 was unsustainable. The Tribunal also held that clause (e) of the Explanation to section 12AB(4) applies only where the activity itself is not genuine or is not carried on in accordance with registration conditions, and that clause (a) must be read purposively to cover diversion away from the institution's objects. Allegations of benefit to specified persons under section 13(3), without proof that the educational activity was sham or that charitable objects were abandoned, did not justify cancellation; such issues are to be addressed at assessment stage. The cancellation order was quashed and registration restored.
Section 12AB(4) could not be used to cancel charitable registration retrospectively for years before its insertion on 1 April 2022, so cancellation from AY 2018-19 was unsustainable. The Tribunal also held that clause (e) of the Explanation to section 12AB(4) applies only where the activity itself is not genuine or is not carried on in accordance with registration conditions, and that clause (a) must be read purposively to cover diversion away from the institution's objects. Allegations of benefit to specified persons under section 13(3), without proof that the educational activity was sham or that charitable objects were abandoned, did not justify cancellation; such issues are to be addressed at assessment stage. The cancellation order was quashed and registration restored.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
