Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
A penalty notice under section 270A must specify the precise limb of charge to be valid; a notice that fails to disclose whether the penalty is proposed for the applicable specific default is vague and unsustainable in law. Applying this principle, the Tribunal held that the notice was void ab initio because it did not mention the particular limb under which penalty was initiated, and the consequential penalty order was also liable to be quashed.
A penalty notice under section 270A must specify the precise limb of charge to be valid; a notice that fails to disclose whether the penalty is proposed for the applicable specific default is vague and unsustainable in law. Applying this principle, the Tribunal held that the notice was void ab initio because it did not mention the particular limb under which penalty was initiated, and the consequential penalty order was also liable to be quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
