Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
521 to 540 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A penalty notice under section 270A must specify the precise limb of charge to be valid; a notice that fails to disclose whether the penalty is proposed for the applicable specific default is vague and unsustainable in law. Applying this principle, the Tribunal held that the notice was void ab initio because it did not mention the particular limb under which penalty was initiated, and the consequential penalty order was also liable to be quashed.
A penalty notice under section 270A must specify the precise limb of charge to be valid; a notice that fails to disclose whether the penalty is proposed for the applicable specific default is vague and unsustainable in law. Applying this principle, the Tribunal held that the notice was void ab initio because it did not mention the particular limb under which penalty was initiated, and the consequential penalty order was also liable to be quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.