Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
A penalty notice under section 270A must specify the precise limb of charge to be valid; a notice that fails to disclose whether the penalty is proposed for the applicable specific default is vague and unsustainable in law. Applying this principle, the Tribunal held that the notice was void ab initio because it did not mention the particular limb under which penalty was initiated, and the consequential penalty order was also liable to be quashed.
A penalty notice under section 270A must specify the precise limb of charge to be valid; a notice that fails to disclose whether the penalty is proposed for the applicable specific default is vague and unsustainable in law. Applying this principle, the Tribunal held that the notice was void ab initio because it did not mention the particular limb under which penalty was initiated, and the consequential penalty order was also liable to be quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.