Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The Tribunal upheld taxation under the concessional regime of section 115BAA and held that section 115JB could not be applied for the year in dispute. It accepted the first appellate authority's view that the assessee's option under section 115BAA was valid, and rejected the Revenue's objection based on the timing of filing Form 10-IC. The Tribunal also noted that the assessee had been processed under section 115BAA for three earlier years, and applied the principle of consistency to support the same tax treatment for the year under appeal. The Revenue's challenge was dismissed and the appellate relief was sustained.
The Tribunal upheld taxation under the concessional regime of section 115BAA and held that section 115JB could not be applied for the year in dispute. It accepted the first appellate authority's view that the assessee's option under section 115BAA was valid, and rejected the Revenue's objection based on the timing of filing Form 10-IC. The Tribunal also noted that the assessee had been processed under section 115BAA for three earlier years, and applied the principle of consistency to support the same tax treatment for the year under appeal. The Revenue's challenge was dismissed and the appellate relief was sustained.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
