Fraudulently obtained SEIS scrips cannot support customs exemption; recovery, confiscation and penalties were sustained, but employee penalty fell awa...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5081 to 5100 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Tribunal upheld taxation under the concessional regime of section 115BAA and held that section 115JB could not be applied for the year in dispute. It accepted the first appellate authority's view that the assessee's option under section 115BAA was valid, and rejected the Revenue's objection based on the timing of filing Form 10-IC. The Tribunal also noted that the assessee had been processed under section 115BAA for three earlier years, and applied the principle of consistency to support the same tax treatment for the year under appeal. The Revenue's challenge was dismissed and the appellate relief was sustained.
The Tribunal upheld taxation under the concessional regime of section 115BAA and held that section 115JB could not be applied for the year in dispute. It accepted the first appellate authority's view that the assessee's option under section 115BAA was valid, and rejected the Revenue's objection based on the timing of filing Form 10-IC. The Tribunal also noted that the assessee had been processed under section 115BAA for three earlier years, and applied the principle of consistency to support the same tax treatment for the year under appeal. The Revenue's challenge was dismissed and the appellate relief was sustained.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.