Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Imported solar cells were alleged to attract safeguard duty under the tariff heading applicable to solar cells, but the Tribunal found material showing exclusive use for satellites, including end-use certificates and a scientist's certificate, with no contrary rebuttal. Because the alternative claim of classification as parts of satellites under Chapter Heading 8803 had not been argued before the adjudicating authority, the Tribunal held that fairness required a fresh opportunity to advance that plea. It set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for de novo consideration, directing fresh determination of classification on the basis of the user test while leaving all issues open.
Imported solar cells were alleged to attract safeguard duty under the tariff heading applicable to solar cells, but the Tribunal found material showing exclusive use for satellites, including end-use certificates and a scientist's certificate, with no contrary rebuttal. Because the alternative claim of classification as parts of satellites under Chapter Heading 8803 had not been argued before the adjudicating authority, the Tribunal held that fairness required a fresh opportunity to advance that plea. It set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for de novo consideration, directing fresh determination of classification on the basis of the user test while leaving all issues open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.