Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Imported solar cells were alleged to attract safeguard duty under the tariff heading applicable to solar cells, but the Tribunal found material showing exclusive use for satellites, including end-use certificates and a scientist's certificate, with no contrary rebuttal. Because the alternative claim of classification as parts of satellites under Chapter Heading 8803 had not been argued before the adjudicating authority, the Tribunal held that fairness required a fresh opportunity to advance that plea. It set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for de novo consideration, directing fresh determination of classification on the basis of the user test while leaving all issues open.
Imported solar cells were alleged to attract safeguard duty under the tariff heading applicable to solar cells, but the Tribunal found material showing exclusive use for satellites, including end-use certificates and a scientist's certificate, with no contrary rebuttal. Because the alternative claim of classification as parts of satellites under Chapter Heading 8803 had not been argued before the adjudicating authority, the Tribunal held that fairness required a fresh opportunity to advance that plea. It set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for de novo consideration, directing fresh determination of classification on the basis of the user test while leaving all issues open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
