Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
321 to 340 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A successful resolution applicant who participated in a CoC-approved process and accepted known stipulations could not later describe the letters of intent as conditional or withdraw from the plan; the objection was rejected and the applicant remained bound by the resolution process. Failure to furnish the performance bank guarantee and comply with the accepted timeline attracted forfeiture of the earnest money deposit under the plan terms, and the forfeiture was upheld. The CoC was also entitled, before confirmation of the resolution plan, to resolve to liquidate the corporate debtor; that decision was treated as an exercise of commercial wisdom, and the challenge to liquidation was dismissed.
A successful resolution applicant who participated in a CoC-approved process and accepted known stipulations could not later describe the letters of intent as conditional or withdraw from the plan; the objection was rejected and the applicant remained bound by the resolution process. Failure to furnish the performance bank guarantee and comply with the accepted timeline attracted forfeiture of the earnest money deposit under the plan terms, and the forfeiture was upheld. The CoC was also entitled, before confirmation of the resolution plan, to resolve to liquidate the corporate debtor; that decision was treated as an exercise of commercial wisdom, and the challenge to liquidation was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.