Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    GST notice visibility after portal upgrade upheld; writ not entertained, but conditional reconsideration allowed on deposit and reply.
    Efficacious appellate remedy bars writ review in GST demand disputes where factual issues require statutory appeal.
    Personal hearing and statutory appeal under GST: writ challenge failed where no reply was filed and no hearing was sought.
    Composite GST assessment for multiple years is impermissible; year-wise proceedings required and fresh action permitted with limitation exclusion.
    Refund of appellate pre-deposit must follow Rule 89, not Section 54, and cannot be withheld on a non-existent investigation.
    Natural justice in ex parte adjudication requires proved service of hearing notices before an appellate order can stand.
    Personal hearing under Section 75(4) is mandatory before adverse adjudication; absence of hearing vitiates the order.
    Electronic Credit Ledger blocking under Rule 86A(3) lapses automatically after one year, requiring immediate unblocking.
    Natural justice breached by non-service of notice, leading to quashing of assessment and recovery proceedings.
    Buy-back of own shares is capital reduction, so section 56(2)(x) cannot tax the price difference.
    Limitation for section 201 proceedings turns on valid show-cause notice; information letters do not start proceedings, and time-bar applies.
    BSNL VRS compensation qualifies as retrenchment compensation, making the receipt exempt from tax subject to verification.
    Invalid jurisdiction in post-search assessment led the ITAT to quash the regular scrutiny assessment.
    Section 153C jurisdiction in search cases depends on handover date of seized material; assessment under section 143(3) was invalid.
    Reassessment beyond four years invalid where reasons lacked failure to disclose, reflected transactions, and sanction was absent.
    Faceless assessment notice must cover specific prejudicial variations; unexplained final additions without notice breach section 144B and natural just...
    Penalty under section 270A was premature where the quantum addition was remanded for fresh adjudication.
    Reassessment after search upheld, but additions on sale of investments deleted for lack of corroborated evidence and cross-examination.
    Mandatory DVO reference under stamp valuation rules defeated capital gains addition and barred post-assessment remand.
    Revenue expenditure and DTAA fixed base test: franchise fees upheld, while TDS issue was remanded for verification.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters
Law of Competition

The Supreme Court held that inter-connected merger steps were...

Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Law of Competition May 30, 2026 Case Laws SC
The Supreme Court held that inter-connected merger steps were adequately notified where the relevant agreements and their commercial linkages were placed on record and assessed in substance, so the transaction could not be treated as a complete non-notification. Section 43A could not be used as an omnibus penalty for alleged under-characterisation once a notice had been filed, reviewed and approved; any complaint of omission or false statement had to satisfy the specific ingredients of Sections 44 and 45. The Court further held that the post-one-year directions reopening the approved combination, keeping approval in abeyance and requiring a fresh Form II filing were beyond jurisdiction, lacked statutory authority, and in any event breached natural justice.

Topics

Acts Income Tax