Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
The provisional attachment of the petitioner's bank account had ceased to operate by efflux of the statutory period under Section 83(2), so the attachment could not continue beyond one year. The Court therefore declared the attachment lapsed by operation of law and held that the petitioner was entitled to operate the bank account, while leaving all other contentions open.
The provisional attachment of the petitioner's bank account had ceased to operate by efflux of the statutory period under Section 83(2), so the attachment could not continue beyond one year. The Court therefore declared the attachment lapsed by operation of law and held that the petitioner was entitled to operate the bank account, while leaving all other contentions open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
