Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
The provisional attachment of the petitioner's bank account had ceased to operate by efflux of the statutory period under Section 83(2), so the attachment could not continue beyond one year. The Court therefore declared the attachment lapsed by operation of law and held that the petitioner was entitled to operate the bank account, while leaving all other contentions open.
The provisional attachment of the petitioner's bank account had ceased to operate by efflux of the statutory period under Section 83(2), so the attachment could not continue beyond one year. The Court therefore declared the attachment lapsed by operation of law and held that the petitioner was entitled to operate the bank account, while leaving all other contentions open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.