Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Rebate under section 87A was held available to a resident individual opting for the new tax regime where total income included long-term capital gains taxable under section 112, because the relevant year's text of section 87A referred to total income without expressly excluding such gains. The Tribunal noted that Parliament had specifically denied rebate for section 112A income, but no comparable bar existed for section 112, so the restriction could not be implied. It also treated the Finance Act, 2025 amendment restricting rebate against special rate income as prospective and substantive, not retrospective. The order denying rebate was set aside and the consequential demand deleted.
Rebate under section 87A was held available to a resident individual opting for the new tax regime where total income included long-term capital gains taxable under section 112, because the relevant year's text of section 87A referred to total income without expressly excluding such gains. The Tribunal noted that Parliament had specifically denied rebate for section 112A income, but no comparable bar existed for section 112, so the restriction could not be implied. It also treated the Finance Act, 2025 amendment restricting rebate against special rate income as prospective and substantive, not retrospective. The order denying rebate was set aside and the consequential demand deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
