Mark-to-Market losses on principal-protected debentures are deductible as business expenditure when the obligation is crystallized under mercantile ac...
Deferred Payment of Customs Duty extended to Eligible Manufacturer Importers with electronic registration and ICEGATE authentication for conditional c...
Tariff classification determines GST schedule and rate; beverages in Schedule III attract the higher rate, tea extracts and syrups in Schedule I attra...
Fraudulent trading requires cogent evidence of intent to defraud; ordinary-course payments protected, except post-insolvency withdrawals must be resto...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5821 to 5840 of 96365 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
In completed assessments under section 153A, additions can be...
Search assessment and multiplex lease receipts: incriminating material limits additions, but commercial exploitation supported business income treatment.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
In completed assessments under section 153A, additions can be made only on the basis of incriminating material having a live nexus with undisclosed income; the seized loose sheet and sub-lease agreement did not meet that test for the unabated years, so the additions for A.Ys. 2013-14 to 2016-17 were deleted. For A.Y. 2017-18, the year was abated, and for A.Y. 2018-19, assessed as the search year, the absence of incriminating material did not bar a fresh assessment, so that jurisdictional objection failed. On merits, receipts from the multiplex lease were treated as business income because the asset was commercially exploited under a structured arrangement, and the receipts had consistently been disclosed on that basis.
In completed assessments under section 153A, additions can be made only on the basis of incriminating material having a live nexus with undisclosed income; the seized loose sheet and sub-lease agreement did not meet that test for the unabated years, so the additions for A.Ys. 2013-14 to 2016-17 were deleted. For A.Y. 2017-18, the year was abated, and for A.Y. 2018-19, assessed as the search year, the absence of incriminating material did not bar a fresh assessment, so that jurisdictional objection failed. On merits, receipts from the multiplex lease were treated as business income because the asset was commercially exploited under a structured arrangement, and the receipts had consistently been disclosed on that basis.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.