Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 95918 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Interest and other realizations of a co-operative bank under liquidation were held not taxable because section 21(2) of the DICGCI Act required all funds realized to be applied first toward repayment of DICGCI liabilities, leaving the bank with no dominion except for permitted liquidation expenses. The Tribunal applied the doctrine of diversion of income by overriding title and held that the amounts were diverted at source and never accrued as income to the assessee. As income did not accrue, the character of the receipt and the related set-off issue did not survive. The CIT(A)'s deletion of the addition was upheld and the Revenue's appeal failed.
Interest and other realizations of a co-operative bank under liquidation were held not taxable because section 21(2) of the DICGCI Act required all funds realized to be applied first toward repayment of DICGCI liabilities, leaving the bank with no dominion except for permitted liquidation expenses. The Tribunal applied the doctrine of diversion of income by overriding title and held that the amounts were diverted at source and never accrued as income to the assessee. As income did not accrue, the character of the receipt and the related set-off issue did not survive. The CIT(A)'s deletion of the addition was upheld and the Revenue's appeal failed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.