Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC held that Rule 18 permits anti-dumping duty to be imposed only within three months from publication of the final findings under Rule 17. As no notification had been issued within that statutory period, the window for acting on the findings had closed. The Court therefore held that the Central Government could no longer act upon the impugned final findings, and the writ petition was disposed of as infructuous.
The HC held that Rule 18 permits anti-dumping duty to be imposed only within three months from publication of the final findings under Rule 17. As no notification had been issued within that statutory period, the window for acting on the findings had closed. The Court therefore held that the Central Government could no longer act upon the impugned final findings, and the writ petition was disposed of as infructuous.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
