Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
The NCLAT considered whether third-party cotton bales kept at a corporate debtor's premises formed part of the liquidation estate and whether it could decide related title and security disputes under the IBC. It held that the appeals had become infructuous because the liquidator had already excluded the cotton bales from the liquidation estate and SBI did not object, leaving no surviving relief to determine. It further held that questions of title, competing security interests, sale of the goods, deterioration, and consequential entitlements fell outside its IBC jurisdiction and had to be pursued before the appropriate forum, including the DRAT. The appellants retained a right of redemption and were left to work out their remedies elsewhere.
The NCLAT considered whether third-party cotton bales kept at a corporate debtor's premises formed part of the liquidation estate and whether it could decide related title and security disputes under the IBC. It held that the appeals had become infructuous because the liquidator had already excluded the cotton bales from the liquidation estate and SBI did not object, leaving no surviving relief to determine. It further held that questions of title, competing security interests, sale of the goods, deterioration, and consequential entitlements fell outside its IBC jurisdiction and had to be pursued before the appropriate forum, including the DRAT. The appellants retained a right of redemption and were left to work out their remedies elsewhere.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
