Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
641 to 660 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court noted that the Supreme Court, in identical reassessment matters, had set aside earlier quashing orders and remitted the cases for fresh consideration while keeping all merits issues open. In light of that binding development, the Court declined to examine the controversy on merits, set aside the Single Judge's order, and remitted the matter for reconsideration with all contentions preserved. The Court also granted the assessee liberty to challenge newly inserted section 147A and any connected or consequential provisions, consistent with the Supreme Court's permission in similar matters, and allowed the Revenue to file further affidavit or submissions.
The High Court noted that the Supreme Court, in identical reassessment matters, had set aside earlier quashing orders and remitted the cases for fresh consideration while keeping all merits issues open. In light of that binding development, the Court declined to examine the controversy on merits, set aside the Single Judge's order, and remitted the matter for reconsideration with all contentions preserved. The Court also granted the assessee liberty to challenge newly inserted section 147A and any connected or consequential provisions, consistent with the Supreme Court's permission in similar matters, and allowed the Revenue to file further affidavit or submissions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.