Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
641 to 660 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Deduction under section 43B for GST payable could not be denied merely because the tax audit report showed the liability as outstanding on the date of signing, where the assessee claimed payment was made before the due date for filing the return. The Tribunal held that payment after the audit report date but before the return due date can still qualify for deduction, so the adjustment made in processing the return could not stand solely on the Form 3CD disclosure. The matter was remanded for verification of the actual payment dates, and the addition was to be deleted if the GST had been paid within the statutory time limit.
Deduction under section 43B for GST payable could not be denied merely because the tax audit report showed the liability as outstanding on the date of signing, where the assessee claimed payment was made before the due date for filing the return. The Tribunal held that payment after the audit report date but before the return due date can still qualify for deduction, so the adjustment made in processing the return could not stand solely on the Form 3CD disclosure. The matter was remanded for verification of the actual payment dates, and the addition was to be deleted if the GST had been paid within the statutory time limit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.