Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Seized material showing unaccounted sales justified taxing only the profit embedded in the suppressed turnover, not the entire sale proceeds, and the addition had to be based on the actual sales figure found in the record rather than extrapolation. A separate addition for business expenditure under section 69C was deleted because the expenditure was sourced from the same unaccounted sales, and adding it again would amount to impermissible double addition. The Tribunal also upheld deletion of the alleged scrap sales addition on the factual finding that all scrap sales were recorded in the books, and rejected the Revenue's grievance on salary expenditure because no such addition had been made in the assessment order.
Seized material showing unaccounted sales justified taxing only the profit embedded in the suppressed turnover, not the entire sale proceeds, and the addition had to be based on the actual sales figure found in the record rather than extrapolation. A separate addition for business expenditure under section 69C was deleted because the expenditure was sourced from the same unaccounted sales, and adding it again would amount to impermissible double addition. The Tribunal also upheld deletion of the alleged scrap sales addition on the factual finding that all scrap sales were recorded in the books, and rejected the Revenue's grievance on salary expenditure because no such addition had been made in the assessment order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
