Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Wall rent paid for sites used to display advertisements was held includible in the taxable value of advertising agency service because it was an intrinsic and inseparable part of the service, and the assessee failed to establish a valid pure agent arrangement or direct contractual link between clients and wall owners. By contrast, the value of printed flex material supplied through a separately registered concern, separately invoiced and taxed as goods, was held not includible under the service tax valuation rules or Notification No. 12/2003-ST. The extended limitation period was rejected because suppression or wilful misstatement was not proved in an audit-based notice, and penalties were deleted as the dispute was interpretational.
Wall rent paid for sites used to display advertisements was held includible in the taxable value of advertising agency service because it was an intrinsic and inseparable part of the service, and the assessee failed to establish a valid pure agent arrangement or direct contractual link between clients and wall owners. By contrast, the value of printed flex material supplied through a separately registered concern, separately invoiced and taxed as goods, was held not includible under the service tax valuation rules or Notification No. 12/2003-ST. The extended limitation period was rejected because suppression or wilful misstatement was not proved in an audit-based notice, and penalties were deleted as the dispute was interpretational.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
