Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3001 to 3020 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Wall rent paid for sites used to display advertisements was held includible in the taxable value of advertising agency service because it was an intrinsic and inseparable part of the service, and the assessee failed to establish a valid pure agent arrangement or direct contractual link between clients and wall owners. By contrast, the value of printed flex material supplied through a separately registered concern, separately invoiced and taxed as goods, was held not includible under the service tax valuation rules or Notification No. 12/2003-ST. The extended limitation period was rejected because suppression or wilful misstatement was not proved in an audit-based notice, and penalties were deleted as the dispute was interpretational.
Wall rent paid for sites used to display advertisements was held includible in the taxable value of advertising agency service because it was an intrinsic and inseparable part of the service, and the assessee failed to establish a valid pure agent arrangement or direct contractual link between clients and wall owners. By contrast, the value of printed flex material supplied through a separately registered concern, separately invoiced and taxed as goods, was held not includible under the service tax valuation rules or Notification No. 12/2003-ST. The extended limitation period was rejected because suppression or wilful misstatement was not proved in an audit-based notice, and penalties were deleted as the dispute was interpretational.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
