Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3001 to 3020 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Further investigation under Section 173(8) CrPC required prior Magistrate approval as read in by precedent, and the third round of investigation and the resulting chargesheet were unsustainable because no such permission was shown. The Court also found that the real dispute concerned a business arrangement and profit-sharing, making the matter essentially civil; the forgery allegation appeared suspect in the overall sequence of events. In these circumstances, continuation of the prosecution amounted to abuse of process, and the FIR and all subsequent proceedings were quashed.
Further investigation under Section 173(8) CrPC required prior Magistrate approval as read in by precedent, and the third round of investigation and the resulting chargesheet were unsustainable because no such permission was shown. The Court also found that the real dispute concerned a business arrangement and profit-sharing, making the matter essentially civil; the forgery allegation appeared suspect in the overall sequence of events. In these circumstances, continuation of the prosecution amounted to abuse of process, and the FIR and all subsequent proceedings were quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
