Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Arrest under the CGST Act was held unlawful where the arrest memo did not properly disclose the grounds of arrest, the grounds were not shown as an annexure, the place of arrest was omitted, and electronic DIN-backed communication was not established. The Court found the later system-generated form prima facie suspicious and treated these defects as non-compliance with mandatory arrest procedure. On that basis, the detention and remand were declared illegal and unconstitutional, the remand order was quashed, and liberty was given to proceed afresh in accordance with law.
Arrest under the CGST Act was held unlawful where the arrest memo did not properly disclose the grounds of arrest, the grounds were not shown as an annexure, the place of arrest was omitted, and electronic DIN-backed communication was not established. The Court found the later system-generated form prima facie suspicious and treated these defects as non-compliance with mandatory arrest procedure. On that basis, the detention and remand were declared illegal and unconstitutional, the remand order was quashed, and liberty was given to proceed afresh in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.