Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
In the absence of any agreement, arrangement or understanding showing that AMP expenditure was incurred for the associated enterprise's sole benefit, Chapter X could not be invoked and the transfer pricing adjustment on AMP spend was deleted. The Tribunal treated the section 14A grounds as consequential and accepted them accordingly. It also allowed the ground on computation-sheet mistakes and directed the Assessing Officer to correct the computation errors in accordance with law.
In the absence of any agreement, arrangement or understanding showing that AMP expenditure was incurred for the associated enterprise's sole benefit, Chapter X could not be invoked and the transfer pricing adjustment on AMP spend was deleted. The Tribunal treated the section 14A grounds as consequential and accepted them accordingly. It also allowed the ground on computation-sheet mistakes and directed the Assessing Officer to correct the computation errors in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
