Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
In the absence of any agreement, arrangement or understanding showing that AMP expenditure was incurred for the associated enterprise's sole benefit, Chapter X could not be invoked and the transfer pricing adjustment on AMP spend was deleted. The Tribunal treated the section 14A grounds as consequential and accepted them accordingly. It also allowed the ground on computation-sheet mistakes and directed the Assessing Officer to correct the computation errors in accordance with law.
In the absence of any agreement, arrangement or understanding showing that AMP expenditure was incurred for the associated enterprise's sole benefit, Chapter X could not be invoked and the transfer pricing adjustment on AMP spend was deleted. The Tribunal treated the section 14A grounds as consequential and accepted them accordingly. It also allowed the ground on computation-sheet mistakes and directed the Assessing Officer to correct the computation errors in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.