Composite GST notices, mandatory limitation, and same-subject bar: HC upheld valid notices but quashed overlapping proceedings and unauthorised withho...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
In the absence of any agreement, arrangement or understanding showing that AMP expenditure was incurred for the associated enterprise's sole benefit, Chapter X could not be invoked and the transfer pricing adjustment on AMP spend was deleted. The Tribunal treated the section 14A grounds as consequential and accepted them accordingly. It also allowed the ground on computation-sheet mistakes and directed the Assessing Officer to correct the computation errors in accordance with law.
In the absence of any agreement, arrangement or understanding showing that AMP expenditure was incurred for the associated enterprise's sole benefit, Chapter X could not be invoked and the transfer pricing adjustment on AMP spend was deleted. The Tribunal treated the section 14A grounds as consequential and accepted them accordingly. It also allowed the ground on computation-sheet mistakes and directed the Assessing Officer to correct the computation errors in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.