Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
The ITAT treated the alleged double addition in income computation, including the set-off of brought forward losses and unabsorbed depreciation, as a connected computational error and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication after hearing the assessee. It also found the transfer pricing adjustment unsustainable because the retained comparables were functionally and product-wise dissimilar to the assessee's manufacturing activity, and held that the assessee's proposed comparables and depreciation policies had to be considered. The transfer pricing issue was likewise set aside and restored to the AO for reconsideration in accordance with law. The appeal was thus allowed for statistical purposes.
The ITAT treated the alleged double addition in income computation, including the set-off of brought forward losses and unabsorbed depreciation, as a connected computational error and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication after hearing the assessee. It also found the transfer pricing adjustment unsustainable because the retained comparables were functionally and product-wise dissimilar to the assessee's manufacturing activity, and held that the assessee's proposed comparables and depreciation policies had to be considered. The transfer pricing issue was likewise set aside and restored to the AO for reconsideration in accordance with law. The appeal was thus allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
