Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
The ITAT treated the alleged double addition in income computation, including the set-off of brought forward losses and unabsorbed depreciation, as a connected computational error and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication after hearing the assessee. It also found the transfer pricing adjustment unsustainable because the retained comparables were functionally and product-wise dissimilar to the assessee's manufacturing activity, and held that the assessee's proposed comparables and depreciation policies had to be considered. The transfer pricing issue was likewise set aside and restored to the AO for reconsideration in accordance with law. The appeal was thus allowed for statistical purposes.
The ITAT treated the alleged double addition in income computation, including the set-off of brought forward losses and unabsorbed depreciation, as a connected computational error and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication after hearing the assessee. It also found the transfer pricing adjustment unsustainable because the retained comparables were functionally and product-wise dissimilar to the assessee's manufacturing activity, and held that the assessee's proposed comparables and depreciation policies had to be considered. The transfer pricing issue was likewise set aside and restored to the AO for reconsideration in accordance with law. The appeal was thus allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
